F4N

NewsUK News · 6 Nov

Thomas Markle Arrested and Charged in US Over Child Sexual Abuse Material

Meghan's father Thomas Markle has been arrested and charged in the US. We examine the FBI complaint, Philippine investigation and Met Police referral.

Staff Reporter
Fish 4 News editorial composite illustrating the arrest of Thomas Markle in Florida and the US federal charge involving child sexual abuse material, with a courthouse and scales of justice.

Thomas Markle Sr, the estranged father of Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, has been arrested in Florida and charged in the United States with one count of possessing child sexual abuse material. Federal prosecutors allege that evidence recovered from two California storage units includes photographs appearing to show him with young girls. Markle has previously denied the allegations and is presumed innocent unless proved guilty.

The arrest on Friday 6 November 2026 is confirmed in a US Department of Justice statement. The accompanying criminal complaint and FBI affidavit, filed on 5 November in the Central District of California, set out the evidence claimed by investigators. The charge is a formal criminal allegation, not a conviction.

What the US authorities have confirmed

The Justice Department identifies the defendant as Thomas Wayne Markle, 82, of Lakeland, Florida. It says he faces one federal count under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), a provision concerning possession of child sexual abuse material. The maximum statutory penalty on conviction is 20 years in federal prison; that is not a sentence already imposed.

The Department said Markle was expected to make his first court appearance in Tampa, Florida, on Friday. At the time of this report, we had not independently verified an outcome from that hearing.

The FBI investigation is continuing, and prosecutors have not publicly announced a trial date or a verdict.

What the FBI says it found in two storage units

According to the sworn affidavit, agents received information in October 2026 about suspected abuse imagery among belongings associated with Markle in the Philippines. Another witness directed them to a storage unit in the Los Angeles area; investigators subsequently identified a second unit.

The affidavit says agents obtained a warrant for the first storage unit on 30 October and for the second on 4 November. Records and items found inside were cited as linking both units to Markle. Investigators say he had rented them since 2008 and had continued making payments in October 2026.

Agents reported seizing approximately 27 items from the first unit and 51 from the second. The total of about 78 refers to physical items, including film negatives, slides and books. It must not be mistaken for a verified count of 78 illegal images.

An FBI agent said that, after converting a selection of film negatives into digital photographs, the agent identified approximately 18 images in the first unit that appeared to constitute child sexual abuse material. A witness who had known Markle since the 1970s subsequently identified the adult man in two photographs as Markle, according to the affidavit. That identification and the nature of the pictures are prosecution allegations for the court to assess.

One photograph is alleged to have been taken in a room associated with a motel business in the Philippines. The filing describes the suspected images in disturbing detail. Fish 4 News is not reproducing those descriptions or the images.

How this relates to the Philippine investigation

The US case follows a separate investigation in the Philippines prompted by claims that suspected child sexual abuse material was discovered among belongings at Markle’s former home in Cebu. His son, Thomas Markle Jr, has been reported as having alerted investigators after finding the material.

On 5 November, Philippine interior secretary Jonvic Remulla said investigators had recovered approximately 7,500 photographs and one video from devices under examination, according to Philippine broadcaster GMA News. ITV News reported that authorities were still working to establish who owned the devices and who was responsible for any material stored on them.

The Philippine figures concern a different collection of electronic evidence from the 78 physical items reported in the two California storage units. Neither the number of files nor the discovery of devices by itself establishes who owned, created or knowingly possessed particular images.

Philippine officials also identified Thomas Markle Jr as a person of interest. They expressly said he was not being treated as a suspect at that stage. No conclusion about his involvement should be inferred from that designation.

Thomas Markle’s response and Meghan’s statement

Markle Sr has strongly rejected the earlier accusations. In an October interview with the Daily Mail, he described them as ‘sick lies’ and denied possessing child sexual abuse imagery. We have not identified a new statement from him or a lawyer responding to the specific US charge.

Meghan said in October that she was ‘deeply distressed’ by the allegations and that her thoughts were with any children who might have been harmed. She has explained that her decision to keep her father at a distance, including from her children, was intended to protect them. Her comments were reported by several news organisations, including Sky News.

Sky News reported on 6 November that representatives of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex declined to issue a further statement on the arrest. Meghan has not been accused of wrongdoing in this case.

Why the Metropolitan Police is facing questions

The British element of this story predates the American arrest. In a statement issued on 29 October, the Metropolitan Police confirmed it had received a letter in January 2019 containing claims about alleged offending outside the UK.

The letter was addressed to the Met’s Protection Command, which assessed it and passed it to Harry and Meghan’s office. The force acknowledged that it had not shared the allegations with other law enforcement agencies at the time.

Following an internal review, the Met made a voluntary referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) on 29 October, covering both its failure to alert other agencies and its decision to pass the letter to the royal couple’s office. The Met also said it was making referrals to relevant overseas authorities.

On 30 October 2026, the IOPC confirmed it had launched an independent investigation into the Met’s failure to pass the 2019 allegations of serious offending to the appropriate overseas law enforcement agencies. The watchdog will examine how the relevant decisions were made and whether police procedures were followed. The separate question of a possible data breach arising from the letter being passed to a third party was returned to the Met to consider under its own processes, according to Sky News’s report of the IOPC’s announcement.

The launch of an independent watchdog investigation is not a finding of police misconduct. Nor does it establish that the claims in the 2019 letter were identical to the evidence cited in the US criminal complaint.

Fish 4 News previously covered the original disclosure about the 2019 letter and the Met’s subsequent referral to the police watchdog. Those reports explain the background to today’s federal charge.

What we know

  • US prosecutors have filed one federal possession charge against Thomas Markle Sr and the FBI confirms his arrest in Florida on 6 November.
  • The sworn US complaint, filed on 5 November, alleges suspected child sexual abuse material was recovered from two California storage units.
  • The 78 figure refers to seized physical items, not a confirmed number of unlawful photographs.
  • A separate Philippine investigation is examining electronic devices and determining ownership and responsibility.
  • The Met acknowledges receiving a 2019 warning letter. The IOPC launched an independent investigation on 30 October into the Met’s failure to pass allegations to overseas authorities.
  • Markle has denied the earlier allegations and remains legally presumed innocent.

What we do not know

  • The outcome of Markle’s initial US court appearance, whether he has entered a plea and any conditions of release.
  • Whether further US charges will be filed or any investigation will establish who produced the images and when.
  • The full provenance of the devices and photographs recovered in the Philippines.
  • What the IOPC’s independent investigation will conclude, and whether it will establish any police misconduct.
  • Whether every allegation contained in the 2019 letter relates to evidence being investigated in 2026.

BBC News video

If the video cannot be played here, watch the BBC News report directly on YouTube.

Correction (6 November 2026): An earlier version said it was not yet known whether the IOPC would conduct an independent investigation. The watchdog had already announced that investigation on 30 October. This article has been corrected to reflect that decision and clarify the separate handling of the alleged data breach.

Sources